Publishing Open-Access Biomedical Data: Legal Challenges

Publication Type:

Journal Article

Authors:

Sara Hugelier

Source:

Biomed Data J, Volume 1, Issue 1, p.43-51 (2015)

Abstract:

This review article gives a brief overview of some of the key legal challenges the OpenScienceLink, http://opensciencelink.eu (hereafter OSL) project faced with publishing biomedical research data online on an open access and re-use basis. Firstly, we give an overview of some of the key privacy challenges that the OSL project faced. Secondly, we analyse the intellectual property chal-lenges that research data possesses and how this type of data could be pro-tected, considering that purely factual elements are generally not protected under intellectual property laws. In this respect, this article also looks at a number of licensing options for these specific types of data.

Full text: 

Publishing Open-Access Biomedical Data: Legal Challenges

Related content: 

The Biomedical Data Journal in the New Era of Open Access to Scientific Information
Committee on Issues in the Transborder Flow of Scientific Data. Bits of Power: Issues in Global Access to Scientific Data. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council, National Academy Press; 1997 p. 10.
OECD Principles and guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding. OECD; 2007 .
Public Consultation on Open Research Data [Internet]. European Commission; 2013 . http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/ec-public-consultation-open-research-data-2-july-brussels
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee on scientific information in the digital age: access, dissemination and preservation. European Commission; 2007 .
Communication from the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: a reinforced European Research Partnership for Excellence and Growth. 2012 . Report No.: COM (2012) 392.
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions towards better access to scientific information: boosting the benefits of public investments in research. 2012 . Report No.: COM(2012)401.
Commission recommendation on access to and preservation of scientific information. 2012 . Report No.: COM (2012) 4890.
J R. Your Medical Records Are for Sale [Internet]. Bloomberg Business Week; 2013. http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-08-08/your-medical-records-are-for-sale
H O, J C. Big opportunities in access to small science data. Data Science Journal [Internet]. 2007;6:58-59. http://works.bepress.com/harlan_onsrud/5/
Jubb M. To Share or not to Share: Publication and Quality Assurance of Research Data Outputs. Research Information Network; 2008 .
P O. Broken Promises of Privacy: Responding to the Surprising Failure of Anonymization. UCLA Law Review [Internet]. Research Information Network; 2009;57(6):1701-77. http://www.uclalawreview.org/?p=1353
P G. International copyright: principles, Law and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
US Supreme Court. Feist Publications. Inc. v. Rurual Telephone Service Co; 1991 .
Germany, Copyright Act §2(2). 1993 .
Legal and ethical issues in open access and data dissemination and preservation [Internet]. RECODE Project. 2013 p. Deliverable 1.3. Report No.: GA # 321463. http://www.recodeproject.eu
OpenScienceLink [Internet]. Deliverable 3.2. 2014 . Report No.: Grant agreement # 318652. http://opensciencelink.eu
S O. Sharing clinical research data: a workshop summary. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press; 2001.
Kaye J, Whitley EA, Lund D, Morrison M, Teare H, Melham K. Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks. European Journal of Human Genetics [Internet]. 2014;. http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/ejhg.2014.71
Trinidad SB, Fullerton SM, Ludman EJ, Jarvik GP, Larson EB, Burke W. Research Practice and Participant Preferences: The Growing Gulf. Science [Internet]. 2011;331(6015):287 - 288. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/doi/10.1126/science.1199000
Peto J. Data protection, informed consent, and research. BMJ [Internet]. 2004;328(7447):1029 - 1030. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.328.7447.1029
Anonymisation: managing data protection risk - code of practice [Internet]. London: Information Commissioner’s Office; 2012 . http://www.ico.org.uk/~/media/documents/library/Data_Protection/Practical_application/anonymisation_code.pdf
V M-S, K C. Big Data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work and think. Boston: Eamon Dolan; 2014.
M B, T Z. A face is exposed for AOL searcher № 4417749. New York Times [Internet]. 2006;. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/09/technology/09aol.html?ex=1312776000
A N, V S. Robust de-anonymization of large sparse datasets [Internet]. 2008 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. Oakland, CA; 2008 . http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~shmat/shmat_oak08netflix.pdf
PB H. Implementing the European Database Directive. In Kabel JJC, Mom GJHM. The Hague: Kluwer Law International; 1998.
v M& Co. Junior Army and Navy Stores. 13thth ed. 21 Ch.D. 369 and Copinger. 1882.
G T. Intellectual Property in Europe. Suppl. 1. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 1997.
N D. Study on Licensing of Publications and Research Data: Summary of Findings [Internet]. Open-Aire; 2013 . http://www.openaire.eu
Football Association Premier League. 2011 . Report No.: ECJ C-403/08.
H V. De juridische bescherming van databanken. Antwerpen: Kluwer; 2001.
MJ D, PB H. Football fixtures, horseraces and spin-offs: the ECJ domesticates the database right. European Intellectual Property Review. 2005;27(3):113-118.
M DCock Bunin, A R, T Vder Linden. The legal status of raw data: a guide for research practice. Utrecht: SURFfoundation; 2009.
B S. When hyperlinks infringe copyright: Svensson v Retriever Sverige [Internet]. Barry Sookman blog; 2014. http://www.barrysookman.com/2014/02/13/when-hyperlinks-infringe-copyright-svensson-v-retriever-sverige/
Standardisation in the area of innovation and technological development notably in the field of Text and Data Mining. Report from the Expert Group. Brussels: European Commission; 2014 pp. 52-53.
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) [Internet]. Creative Commons; 2014. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Sheehan M. Broad consent is informed consent. BMJ [Internet]. 2011;343(nov01 3):d6900 - d6900. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.d6900
National Library of Medicine (brackets, no "et al."): Hugelier S. Publishing Open-Access Biomedical Data: Legal Challenges. Biomed Data J. 2015;1(1):43-51.
National Library of Medicine (grant proposals with PMCID/PMID): Hugelier S. Publishing Open-Access Biomedical Data: Legal Challenges. Biomed Data J. 2015;1(1):43-51.
National Library of Medicine (NLM) - Grant with PMID: Hugelier S. Publishing Open-Access Biomedical Data: Legal Challenges. Biomed Data J. 2015;1(1):43-51.
32,219 times
# File Name Number of Downloads
1 bmdj.01108_legal_challenges.pdf 5730
(1)
Share